<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 294 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345182</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that remittances received from overseas customers through the branch to the appellant are not liable to tax. The matter was remanded back to the original authority to quantify services availed after 1st July 2012 falling within the scope of rule 4 of Place of Provision of Services, 2012. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 294 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345182</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that remittances received from overseas customers through the branch to the appellant are not liable to tax. The matter was remanded back to the original authority to quantify services availed after 1st July 2012 falling within the scope of rule 4 of Place of Provision of Services, 2012. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>