<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (5) TMI 23 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9028</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues. The disallowance of a portion of the director&#039;s remuneration was deemed justified as it improved the company&#039;s business and was not excessive compared to other directors. The disallowance of expenditure on crockery and linen as capital expenditure was rejected, emphasizing that such replacement expenses are deductible in a hotel business. The deduction claimed for medical expenses for the company&#039;s chairman was allowed, considering the bona fide nature of the expenditure despite the absence of specific rules. Costs were awarded to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (5) TMI 23 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9028</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues. The disallowance of a portion of the director&#039;s remuneration was deemed justified as it improved the company&#039;s business and was not excessive compared to other directors. The disallowance of expenditure on crockery and linen as capital expenditure was rejected, emphasizing that such replacement expenses are deductible in a hotel business. The deduction claimed for medical expenses for the company&#039;s chairman was allowed, considering the bona fide nature of the expenditure despite the absence of specific rules. Costs were awarded to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>