<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 824 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193039</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, holding that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 does not apply to the transfer of shares, deleting the addition made by the AO based on stamp duty valuation. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the AO&#039;s addition of separate payment to the sale consideration, considering it as repayment of liabilities rather than additional consideration. The capital gains were treated as long term instead of short term, and the alternative claim for substitution of indexed cost was dismissed as moot. Ultimately, the appeals were allowed, and the assessees&#039; positions were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 17:12:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 824 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193039</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, holding that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 does not apply to the transfer of shares, deleting the addition made by the AO based on stamp duty valuation. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the AO&#039;s addition of separate payment to the sale consideration, considering it as repayment of liabilities rather than additional consideration. The capital gains were treated as long term instead of short term, and the alternative claim for substitution of indexed cost was dismissed as moot. Ultimately, the appeals were allowed, and the assessees&#039; positions were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>