<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (1) TMI 2 - Privy Council</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193035</link>
    <description>Interest earned on Government securities purchased from a bank&#039;s liquid assets to satisfy a statutory liquidity requirement was treated as assessable interest on securities, not as banking business profits. The framework under the Income-tax Act, 1922 distinguished income from securities from business income, and the investment was found to be only a temporary parking of liquid funds rather than an integral part of banking operations. Authorities relied on for a different result were distinguished because, in those cases, the investments were inseparable from the business activity. The assessment in favour of Revenue was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:33:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (1) TMI 2 - Privy Council</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193035</link>
      <description>Interest earned on Government securities purchased from a bank&#039;s liquid assets to satisfy a statutory liquidity requirement was treated as assessable interest on securities, not as banking business profits. The framework under the Income-tax Act, 1922 distinguished income from securities from business income, and the investment was found to be only a temporary parking of liquid funds rather than an integral part of banking operations. Authorities relied on for a different result were distinguished because, in those cases, the investments were inseparable from the business activity. The assessment in favour of Revenue was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>