<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (4) TMI 33 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s appellate power was confined to the subject-matter of the assessee&#039;s appeal and could not, without any departmental cross-appeal or cross-objection, place the assessee in a worse position by directing a higher disallowance. The assessee was also entitled to adopt different accounting methods for different sources of income, so rent from let-out factory premises could not be forced onto the mercantile basis merely because business income was so assessed. However, the finding that two partners were benamidars of the assessee was a factual inference supported by material and was not open to interference in reference. The questions were therefore answered partly for and partly against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (4) TMI 33 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s appellate power was confined to the subject-matter of the assessee&#039;s appeal and could not, without any departmental cross-appeal or cross-objection, place the assessee in a worse position by directing a higher disallowance. The assessee was also entitled to adopt different accounting methods for different sources of income, so rent from let-out factory premises could not be forced onto the mercantile basis merely because business income was so assessed. However, the finding that two partners were benamidars of the assessee was a factual inference supported by material and was not open to interference in reference. The questions were therefore answered partly for and partly against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>