<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (9) TMI 105 - High Court Of Allahabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193034</link>
    <description>Under the Indian Income-tax Act, business income is computed according to the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee. Where a bona fide hybrid system keeps litigation expenditure in suspense and writes it off only when the litigation ends, deduction is allowed in the year of write-off even if the payments were made in earlier years. The accounting treatment, not the timing of payment alone, governed the tax result, and the disallowance was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:11:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (9) TMI 105 - High Court Of Allahabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193034</link>
      <description>Under the Indian Income-tax Act, business income is computed according to the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee. Where a bona fide hybrid system keeps litigation expenditure in suspense and writes it off only when the litigation ends, deduction is allowed in the year of write-off even if the payments were made in earlier years. The accounting treatment, not the timing of payment alone, governed the tax result, and the disallowance was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>