<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1124 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193031</link>
    <description>Appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that an assessee could claim mark-to-market provisioning on trading in derivative instruments in the profit and loss account. The respondent waived service. The court also directed the Registry to call for the original record from the Tribunal, prepare the complete paper book in accordance with the rules, and notify the Tribunal of the admission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:29:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1124 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193031</link>
      <description>Appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that an assessee could claim mark-to-market provisioning on trading in derivative instruments in the profit and loss account. The respondent waived service. The court also directed the Registry to call for the original record from the Tribunal, prepare the complete paper book in accordance with the rules, and notify the Tribunal of the admission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>