<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (5) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9004</link>
    <description>An electrolysis plant established in a separate building under a separate licence, with separate capital and producing caustic soda as an independently marketable raw material, was treated as a new industrial undertaking for section 15C purposes. The relevant test was whether the unit was formed by splitting up or reconstructing an existing business; mere consumption of the product in the assessee&#039;s paper business did not, by itself, make the unit part of that business. Reading section 15C in its broad commercial sense and to promote new industry, the plant was held not to be a mere reconstruction of the earlier business, and relief was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (5) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9004</link>
      <description>An electrolysis plant established in a separate building under a separate licence, with separate capital and producing caustic soda as an independently marketable raw material, was treated as a new industrial undertaking for section 15C purposes. The relevant test was whether the unit was formed by splitting up or reconstructing an existing business; mere consumption of the product in the assessee&#039;s paper business did not, by itself, make the unit part of that business. Reading section 15C in its broad commercial sense and to promote new industry, the plant was held not to be a mere reconstruction of the earlier business, and relief was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>