<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 255 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of the donation&#039;s genuineness back to the Assessing Officer for further examination and allowing the depreciation claim on intangible assets. Other grounds, including jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer and disallowance of travel expenses, were either dismissed or not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:50:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 255 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of the donation&#039;s genuineness back to the Assessing Officer for further examination and allowing the depreciation claim on intangible assets. Other grounds, including jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer and disallowance of travel expenses, were either dismissed or not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>