https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345139 The Commissioner dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to failure to challenge the limitation period. The appellant's appeal, concerning service tax liability as a sub-contractor when the main contractor pays, was considered time-barred. The Commissioner found the extended limitation period unnecessary and remanded the appellant's appeal for reconsideration on the limitation issue. The judgment was delivered by Mr. Ramesh Nair on 14/6/2017. en-us Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:49:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345139 The Commissioner dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to failure to challenge the limitation period. The appellant's appeal, concerning service tax liability as a sub-contractor when the main contractor pays, was considered time-barred. The Commissioner found the extended limitation period unnecessary and remanded the appellant's appeal for reconsideration on the limitation issue. The judgment was delivered by Mr. Ramesh Nair on 14/6/2017. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345139