<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 247 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345135</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, emphasizing that tax liability under the Finance Act, 1994 must be based on the provision of specific services and not just the transfer of money. The judgment highlighted the importance of evidence in establishing tax liability and clarified the distinction between different taxable services under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 247 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345135</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, emphasizing that tax liability under the Finance Act, 1994 must be based on the provision of specific services and not just the transfer of money. The judgment highlighted the importance of evidence in establishing tax liability and clarified the distinction between different taxable services under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>