<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 244 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345132</link>
    <description>A Central Excise dispute reached the Supreme Court by special leave petition, but the Court dismissed the petition without recording any substantive reasons or legal findings. The document does not disclose the underlying excise issue, the statutory question in controversy, or any principle applied, so only the dismissal of the petition can be stated from the text provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 244 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345132</link>
      <description>A Central Excise dispute reached the Supreme Court by special leave petition, but the Court dismissed the petition without recording any substantive reasons or legal findings. The document does not disclose the underlying excise issue, the statutory question in controversy, or any principle applied, so only the dismissal of the petition can be stated from the text provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>