https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345131 The court granted the appellant another opportunity to contest the matter on merits after finding the appellant's representative's absence before CESTAT was unintentional. The court quashed the order dismissing the Miscellaneous Application and the appeal, restoring them with the condition that the appellant deposits 25% of the duty within four weeks. This decision upheld the appellant's statutory right to appeal. en-us Sat, 01 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:49:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345131 The court granted the appellant another opportunity to contest the matter on merits after finding the appellant's representative's absence before CESTAT was unintentional. The court quashed the order dismissing the Miscellaneous Application and the appeal, restoring them with the condition that the appellant deposits 25% of the duty within four weeks. This decision upheld the appellant's statutory right to appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Sat, 01 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345131