<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 239 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345127</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the appeal against the final judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the Assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with legal provisions, particularly in interpreting Section 11 B for claiming duty refunds and validating documents like credit notes. The dismissal of the appeal closed pending matters without any costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 239 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345127</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the appeal against the final judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the Assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with legal provisions, particularly in interpreting Section 11 B for claiming duty refunds and validating documents like credit notes. The dismissal of the appeal closed pending matters without any costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>