<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 237 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345125</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the dutiability of sub-station equipment support structures and transmissions towers. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the refund claim based on unjust enrichment was overturned. The Tribunal emphasized the need for further evidence, such as ledger entries, to substantiate the claim of unjust enrichment. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 237 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345125</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the dutiability of sub-station equipment support structures and transmissions towers. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the refund claim based on unjust enrichment was overturned. The Tribunal emphasized the need for further evidence, such as ledger entries, to substantiate the claim of unjust enrichment. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>