<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 229 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the re-finalization of Shipping Bills was not in accordance with the law as there was no legal requirement to re-finalize bills that were already deemed final. The appellant was entitled to interest as per the Customs Act, 1962, from the date of the initial finalization of the Shipping Bills. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with interest to be paid as per the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 229 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the re-finalization of Shipping Bills was not in accordance with the law as there was no legal requirement to re-finalize bills that were already deemed final. The appellant was entitled to interest as per the Customs Act, 1962, from the date of the initial finalization of the Shipping Bills. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with interest to be paid as per the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>