<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (12) TMI 33 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8980</link>
    <description>Directors&#039; remuneration is deductible where, on an objective appraisal of the proved facts, it is incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes and not tainted by extra-commercial consideration. The Tribunal, as final fact-finding authority, may draw the legal inference from those facts, and its conclusion will stand unless it is based on no evidence, ignores material facts, or applies the wrong legal test. On the facts discussed, the directors were senior executives who had earlier accepted a reduction in pay in the company&#039;s interest, had no shareholding or control over policy, and later received restoration of part of that cut. The deduction was therefore upheld as commercially expedient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (12) TMI 33 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8980</link>
      <description>Directors&#039; remuneration is deductible where, on an objective appraisal of the proved facts, it is incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes and not tainted by extra-commercial consideration. The Tribunal, as final fact-finding authority, may draw the legal inference from those facts, and its conclusion will stand unless it is based on no evidence, ignores material facts, or applies the wrong legal test. On the facts discussed, the directors were senior executives who had earlier accepted a reduction in pay in the company&#039;s interest, had no shareholding or control over policy, and later received restoration of part of that cut. The deduction was therefore upheld as commercially expedient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>