<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reopening Property Assessment: Higher Stamp Duty Doesn&#039;t Prove Extra Payment Beyond Sale Deed Consideration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35423</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment - unaccounted investment in the purchase of the property - There cannot be an automatic presumption that a purchaser of the property had paid consideration higher than the sale consideration reflected in the sale deed, the moment the stamp valuation authority of the State Government demanded and the parties paid higher stamp duty. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:09:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:09:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reopening Property Assessment: Higher Stamp Duty Doesn&#039;t Prove Extra Payment Beyond Sale Deed Consideration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35423</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment - unaccounted investment in the purchase of the property - There cannot be an automatic presumption that a purchaser of the property had paid consideration higher than the sale consideration reflected in the sale deed, the moment the stamp valuation authority of the State Government demanded and the parties paid higher stamp duty. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:09:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>