<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Allows &quot;Mark to Market&quot; Loss Claim; CIT(A) Disallowance Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35422</link>
    <description>&quot;Mark to Market” loss - AO did not disallow the claim of loss but CIT(A) disallowed the claim of loss - In the absence of any fact with regard to the nature of the said transaction, it would not be possible to accept the contention of the revenue with regard to &#039;Mark to Market&#039; loss. - Claim allowed - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:07:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:07:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Allows &quot;Mark to Market&quot; Loss Claim; CIT(A) Disallowance Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35422</link>
      <description>&quot;Mark to Market” loss - AO did not disallow the claim of loss but CIT(A) disallowed the claim of loss - In the absence of any fact with regard to the nature of the said transaction, it would not be possible to accept the contention of the revenue with regard to &#039;Mark to Market&#039; loss. - Claim allowed - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:07:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>