<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 216 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345104</link>
    <description>The SC found no merit in the Special Leave Petition and dismissed it, leaving the impugned matter undisturbed. The order does not record any substantive legal reasoning on the underlying income tax dispute and indicates only that the petition did not warrant interference under the court&#039;s special leave jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 216 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345104</link>
      <description>The SC found no merit in the Special Leave Petition and dismissed it, leaving the impugned matter undisturbed. The order does not record any substantive legal reasoning on the underlying income tax dispute and indicates only that the petition did not warrant interference under the court&#039;s special leave jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>