<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (5) TMI 19 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8962</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding it within the Income-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction. The petitioner-firm&#039;s failure to fully disclose material facts, specifically regarding market rates and reasons for lower sales, justified the reassessment proceedings. The court dismissed the petition, allowing the reassessment to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (5) TMI 19 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8962</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding it within the Income-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction. The petitioner-firm&#039;s failure to fully disclose material facts, specifically regarding market rates and reasons for lower sales, justified the reassessment proceedings. The court dismissed the petition, allowing the reassessment to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>