<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 211 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345099</link>
    <description>The court refrained from determining ownership of the Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) seized during search operations, deferring the matter to the appellate Commissioner for further examination based on available evidence. The petitioner&#039;s request for release of the FDRs and unfreezing of bank accounts was not granted, with the petition being disposed of pending resolution through the appeals process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 19:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=480007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 211 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345099</link>
      <description>The court refrained from determining ownership of the Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) seized during search operations, deferring the matter to the appellate Commissioner for further examination based on available evidence. The petitioner&#039;s request for release of the FDRs and unfreezing of bank accounts was not granted, with the petition being disposed of pending resolution through the appeals process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>