https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345093 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a reexamination of the issue of the addition of cash deposit in the bank by the Assessing Officer based on the additional evidence provided during the appellate proceedings. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) did not adequately consider the details claimed in the cashbook and books of accounts, necessitating a fresh examination by the Assessing Officer to verify the evidence and entries. The appellant's grounds of appeal were allowed, and the appeal was granted accordingly. en-us Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jul 2017 07:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345093 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a reexamination of the issue of the addition of cash deposit in the bank by the Assessing Officer based on the additional evidence provided during the appellate proceedings. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) did not adequately consider the details claimed in the cashbook and books of accounts, necessitating a fresh examination by the Assessing Officer to verify the evidence and entries. The appellant's grounds of appeal were allowed, and the appeal was granted accordingly. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345093