<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1227 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193010</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) was not justified in invoking section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of revenue as the Assessing Officer had conducted enquiries regarding the sales tax issue. The CIT&#039;s direction for a fresh assessment contradicted the requirement of section 263, which necessitates a categorical finding of error in the original order. As the CIT did not provide a concrete finding on the case&#039;s merits and merely ordered further enquiry, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 07:40:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1227 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193010</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) was not justified in invoking section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of revenue as the Assessing Officer had conducted enquiries regarding the sales tax issue. The CIT&#039;s direction for a fresh assessment contradicted the requirement of section 263, which necessitates a categorical finding of error in the original order. As the CIT did not provide a concrete finding on the case&#039;s merits and merely ordered further enquiry, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>