<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (2) TMI 133 - High Court Of Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193006</link>
    <description>Civil court jurisdiction is barred where a plaint, in substance, seeks declaration of bhumidari rights or challenges vesting of agricultural land governed by the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954. The court held that the Act is a complete code and that matters assigned to revenue authorities under Schedule I, including claims to bhumidari status and related possession or title disputes, must be pursued in the statutory forum. The substance of the plaint controls, not its form, so recasting the claim as a challenge to vesting, or describing the land as banjar or ghair murnkin, does not avoid the bar. The remedy lies before the revenue authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 16:55:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (2) TMI 133 - High Court Of Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193006</link>
      <description>Civil court jurisdiction is barred where a plaint, in substance, seeks declaration of bhumidari rights or challenges vesting of agricultural land governed by the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954. The court held that the Act is a complete code and that matters assigned to revenue authorities under Schedule I, including claims to bhumidari status and related possession or title disputes, must be pursued in the statutory forum. The substance of the plaint controls, not its form, so recasting the claim as a challenge to vesting, or describing the land as banjar or ghair murnkin, does not avoid the bar. The remedy lies before the revenue authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>