https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193003 In a concerted armed assault, culpability was treated as attributable under Section 326 IPC where a child above twelve used a sword, struck a vital part, and participated in the attack with common purpose; the facts supported an inference of intention to cause grievous hurt by a dangerous weapon, so reduction to Section 324 IPC was rejected. Juvenile protection and probationary relief were also declined because the record did not displace criminal responsibility under Section 83 IPC and the offence, as upheld, did not justify interference with sentence. The conviction and sentence were maintained, and no probation was granted. en-us Tue, 16 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:54:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193003 In a concerted armed assault, culpability was treated as attributable under Section 326 IPC where a child above twelve used a sword, struck a vital part, and participated in the attack with common purpose; the facts supported an inference of intention to cause grievous hurt by a dangerous weapon, so reduction to Section 324 IPC was rejected. Juvenile protection and probationary relief were also declined because the record did not displace criminal responsibility under Section 83 IPC and the offence, as upheld, did not justify interference with sentence. The conviction and sentence were maintained, and no probation was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193003