<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1220 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192983</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of Eclerx and Mold Tek from the comparables for transfer pricing adjustments. The issue of communication expenses under Section 10A was decided in favor of the assessee. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:23:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1220 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192983</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of Eclerx and Mold Tek from the comparables for transfer pricing adjustments. The issue of communication expenses under Section 10A was decided in favor of the assessee. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>