<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (12) TMI 31 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8955</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of penalty proceedings by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner imposed a penalty for concealing income, which was later reduced by the Tribunal. The court determined that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had the jurisdiction to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, emphasizing that the satisfaction of concealment of income during any proceedings empowered either the Income-tax Officer or the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to impose a penalty. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Commissioner and awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (12) TMI 31 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8955</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of penalty proceedings by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner imposed a penalty for concealing income, which was later reduced by the Tribunal. The court determined that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had the jurisdiction to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, emphasizing that the satisfaction of concealment of income during any proceedings empowered either the Income-tax Officer or the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to impose a penalty. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Commissioner and awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>