<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1222 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192990</link>
    <description>In both assessment years, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeals. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to adopt the net profit figures as declared in the bank statements and restricted the disallowance of expenses to 10%. Additions related to college fees, bank deposits, and FDR investments were upheld due to lack of explanation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:23:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1222 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192990</link>
      <description>In both assessment years, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeals. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to adopt the net profit figures as declared in the bank statements and restricted the disallowance of expenses to 10%. Additions related to college fees, bank deposits, and FDR investments were upheld due to lack of explanation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>