<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1223 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192991</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, and the penalty matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-decision in accordance with law and the findings of the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the burden of proof on the assessee to provide supporting evidence for claims in tax proceedings, leading to the reconsideration of the penalty matter at the Assessing Officer level.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:23:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1223 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192991</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, and the penalty matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-decision in accordance with law and the findings of the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the burden of proof on the assessee to provide supporting evidence for claims in tax proceedings, leading to the reconsideration of the penalty matter at the Assessing Officer level.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>