https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192999 Territorial jurisdiction, maintainability, legality of the FIR, the effect of an earlier preliminary inquiry, State consent under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, alleged breach of CBI Manual guidelines, and apprehended arrest were treated as warranting interim scrutiny. The Court found a prima facie case for interim consideration and held that the balance of convenience and risk of irreparable injury favoured protection. Investigation was permitted to continue, but the respondents were restrained from recording the petitioners' statements without leave, from effecting arrest at that stage, and from filing the challan without express leave. en-us Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:23:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192999 Territorial jurisdiction, maintainability, legality of the FIR, the effect of an earlier preliminary inquiry, State consent under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, alleged breach of CBI Manual guidelines, and apprehended arrest were treated as warranting interim scrutiny. The Court found a prima facie case for interim consideration and held that the balance of convenience and risk of irreparable injury favoured protection. Investigation was permitted to continue, but the respondents were restrained from recording the petitioners' statements without leave, from effecting arrest at that stage, and from filing the challan without express leave. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192999