https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193002 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioners' factory falls within the definition of an industry engaged in the manufacture or production of textiles under the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952. The court held that the factory is covered by the Act's unamended Schedule, and the opposite party was justified in enforcing compliance with the Act's provisions. The petition was dismissed, costs were awarded against the petitioners, and they were directed to adhere to the Act's requirements. en-us Mon, 15 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:23:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193002 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioners' factory falls within the definition of an industry engaged in the manufacture or production of textiles under the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952. The court held that the factory is covered by the Act's unamended Schedule, and the opposite party was justified in enforcing compliance with the Act's provisions. The petition was dismissed, costs were awarded against the petitioners, and they were directed to adhere to the Act's requirements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193002