<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 199 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of Technical Fees as revenue expenditure, emphasizing the revenue nature of the payment. However, the Tribunal referred the disallowance under section 14A back to the AO for reevaluation, as further examination of the calculations was deemed necessary based on the law laid down by the Delhi High Court. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 11:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 199 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of Technical Fees as revenue expenditure, emphasizing the revenue nature of the payment. However, the Tribunal referred the disallowance under section 14A back to the AO for reevaluation, as further examination of the calculations was deemed necessary based on the law laid down by the Delhi High Court. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>