<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (8) TMI 38 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8952</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled that the penalty imposed by the Income-tax Officer was not valid in this case. The Court emphasized the importance of adjusting advance tax, issuing valid demands, and following proper procedures before penalizing the assessee. The judgment favored the assessee, highlighting the necessity of adherence to statutory provisions and ensuring correctness in demands before imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (8) TMI 38 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8952</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled that the penalty imposed by the Income-tax Officer was not valid in this case. The Court emphasized the importance of adjusting advance tax, issuing valid demands, and following proper procedures before penalizing the assessee. The judgment favored the assessee, highlighting the necessity of adherence to statutory provisions and ensuring correctness in demands before imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>