<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 196 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the appellants willfully suppressed material facts to evade service tax, justifying the penalty imposed. The appellants&#039; claim of being unaware of service tax obligations was dismissed due to their failure to provide evidence supporting their assertion of acting as dummies for the company. The Tribunal found that the appellants, being high net worth individuals with vast business experience, could not claim ignorance of the law, leading to the dismissal of their appeal. The penalty imposed on the appellants for non-compliance with service tax obligations was upheld by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 196 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the appellants willfully suppressed material facts to evade service tax, justifying the penalty imposed. The appellants&#039; claim of being unaware of service tax obligations was dismissed due to their failure to provide evidence supporting their assertion of acting as dummies for the company. The Tribunal found that the appellants, being high net worth individuals with vast business experience, could not claim ignorance of the law, leading to the dismissal of their appeal. The penalty imposed on the appellants for non-compliance with service tax obligations was upheld by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>