<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 194 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed three appeals by M/s State Trading Corporation of India Ltd challenging tax demands for business auxiliary services. The core issue was the taxability of trade margin as consideration for services. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s grounds lacked substance, emphasizing the assessable value determination under the Finance Act. The appellant&#039;s arguments were countered, and the Tribunal concluded that the appeals lacked merit, upholding the original demands. The judgment was delivered on 15/06/2017 by Tribunal members Shri M V Ravindran and Shri C J Mathew, with representation from both parties during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 194 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed three appeals by M/s State Trading Corporation of India Ltd challenging tax demands for business auxiliary services. The core issue was the taxability of trade margin as consideration for services. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s grounds lacked substance, emphasizing the assessable value determination under the Finance Act. The appellant&#039;s arguments were countered, and the Tribunal concluded that the appeals lacked merit, upholding the original demands. The judgment was delivered on 15/06/2017 by Tribunal members Shri M V Ravindran and Shri C J Mathew, with representation from both parties during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>