<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 186 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s declared value of imported goods, supported by the original Chartered Engineer certificate, rejecting the local assessment. The confiscation of goods over 10 years old under the Customs Act, 1962, was upheld. The penalty imposed on importers was reduced by the Tribunal. The decision was based on legal principles and precedents, ensuring a thorough review of valuation discrepancies, Chartered Engineer certificates&#039; validity, confiscation, and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 186 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s declared value of imported goods, supported by the original Chartered Engineer certificate, rejecting the local assessment. The confiscation of goods over 10 years old under the Customs Act, 1962, was upheld. The penalty imposed on importers was reduced by the Tribunal. The decision was based on legal principles and precedents, ensuring a thorough review of valuation discrepancies, Chartered Engineer certificates&#039; validity, confiscation, and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>