<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 181 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345069</link>
    <description>A company in liquidation retains corporate until dissolution, and its unexpired leasehold rights remain assets available for beneficial winding up unless the lease is lawfully determined or disclaimed. The Bombay HC held that mere winding up did not justify directing the Official Liquidator to hand back the leasehold open land to the lessor, particularly where the lease still had a substantial term and sale of the rights had already been permitted for creditors&#039; benefit. It also upheld the lessor&#039;s claim for rent arrears, directing the Official Liquidator to pay the dues and continue monthly rent, while allowing a fresh valuation before any request to reduce the reserve price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 11:29:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 181 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345069</link>
      <description>A company in liquidation retains corporate until dissolution, and its unexpired leasehold rights remain assets available for beneficial winding up unless the lease is lawfully determined or disclaimed. The Bombay HC held that mere winding up did not justify directing the Official Liquidator to hand back the leasehold open land to the lessor, particularly where the lease still had a substantial term and sale of the rights had already been permitted for creditors&#039; benefit. It also upheld the lessor&#039;s claim for rent arrears, directing the Official Liquidator to pay the dues and continue monthly rent, while allowing a fresh valuation before any request to reduce the reserve price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>