https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345066 Where the investigating agency filed a closure report against particular accused and the record did not disclose sufficient evidence to make out a prima facie case, the High Court held that cognizance and summoning could not be sustained merely on material relating mainly to other accused persons. The court emphasized that it must apply judicial mind to whether the available material justifies summoning, and that further investigation is the proper course where the evidence against those accused is deficient. Finding the prosecution material at best corroborative and the allegations not capable of proof beyond reasonable doubt, the court set aside the summoning order and allowed the petitions. en-us Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jul 2017 11:28:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345066 Where the investigating agency filed a closure report against particular accused and the record did not disclose sufficient evidence to make out a prima facie case, the High Court held that cognizance and summoning could not be sustained merely on material relating mainly to other accused persons. The court emphasized that it must apply judicial mind to whether the available material justifies summoning, and that further investigation is the proper course where the evidence against those accused is deficient. Finding the prosecution material at best corroborative and the allegations not capable of proof beyond reasonable doubt, the court set aside the summoning order and allowed the petitions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345066