<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 671 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192981</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld because the delay was found to have been sufficiently explained, and no basis was shown to interfere with the condonation order. The challenge by the revenue therefore failed, leaving the appeal to proceed despite the delayed filing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 18:50:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 671 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192981</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld because the delay was found to have been sufficiently explained, and no basis was shown to interfere with the condonation order. The challenge by the revenue therefore failed, leaving the appeal to proceed despite the delayed filing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>