<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (3) TMI 137 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192980</link>
    <description>A registered sale deed completed title in favour of the vendee where the balance price was timely tendered and the vendor refused acceptance; the vendor&#039;s later cancellation deed and resale could not defeat the purchaser&#039;s rights. The document also states that a redemption suit is not barred for lack of prior court deposit of mortgage money, because the Transfer of Property Act provides alternative modes of redemption, including private tender, court deposit, and suit for redemption. On that basis, the earlier transaction was treated as a redeemable mortgage by conditional sale and the concurrent decree for the respondents was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 18:15:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (3) TMI 137 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192980</link>
      <description>A registered sale deed completed title in favour of the vendee where the balance price was timely tendered and the vendor refused acceptance; the vendor&#039;s later cancellation deed and resale could not defeat the purchaser&#039;s rights. The document also states that a redemption suit is not barred for lack of prior court deposit of mortgage money, because the Transfer of Property Act provides alternative modes of redemption, including private tender, court deposit, and suit for redemption. On that basis, the earlier transaction was treated as a redeemable mortgage by conditional sale and the concurrent decree for the respondents was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>