<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 174 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld most decisions favoring the assessee, except for disallowance of additional depreciation, consistently denied based on prior rulings. Valid agreements and High Court orders were emphasized for royalty payments, treating software expenses as revenue. Assessment reopening was remitted for adjudication, penalty deletion upheld citing legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 20:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 174 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld most decisions favoring the assessee, except for disallowance of additional depreciation, consistently denied based on prior rulings. Valid agreements and High Court orders were emphasized for royalty payments, treating software expenses as revenue. Assessment reopening was remitted for adjudication, penalty deletion upheld citing legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>