<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 173 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345061</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that additions under Section 153C were unjustified without incriminating material. It invalidated proceedings under Section 153C due to the absence of recorded satisfaction before file transfer. The Tribunal directed acceptance of declared agricultural income and found no merit in additions under Sections 68 and 41.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 08:28:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 173 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345061</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that additions under Section 153C were unjustified without incriminating material. It invalidated proceedings under Section 153C due to the absence of recorded satisfaction before file transfer. The Tribunal directed acceptance of declared agricultural income and found no merit in additions under Sections 68 and 41.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>