<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 170 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345058</link>
    <description>Refund under an export-linked service tax notification cannot be denied merely because invoices do not strictly describe the services, where the services were actually used for export of goods and tax was borne. The text states that port-related services, inspection and certification services, customs house agent services, and storage and warehousing services were all treated as eligible when the factual nexus with export was established. Procedural defects in invoices and incomplete particulars were regarded as insufficient grounds to defeat the recipient&#039;s refund claim. The rejection orders were set aside and the refund claims were held admissible with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 170 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345058</link>
      <description>Refund under an export-linked service tax notification cannot be denied merely because invoices do not strictly describe the services, where the services were actually used for export of goods and tax was borne. The text states that port-related services, inspection and certification services, customs house agent services, and storage and warehousing services were all treated as eligible when the factual nexus with export was established. Procedural defects in invoices and incomplete particulars were regarded as insufficient grounds to defeat the recipient&#039;s refund claim. The rejection orders were set aside and the refund claims were held admissible with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>