https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345049 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. The demand of duty for non-return of capital goods within 180 days was found to be in compliance with the rules, and the penalty related to the written off value of inputs was set aside due to the absence of any malafide intention or suppression of facts. en-us Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345049 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. The demand of duty for non-return of capital goods within 180 days was found to be in compliance with the rules, and the penalty related to the written off value of inputs was set aside due to the absence of any malafide intention or suppression of facts. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345049