https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345038 The judgment in this case involved various issues such as failure to confiscate goods provisionally released on bond, mis-declaration to evade floor price, challenge against penalty imposition based on expired notifications, and questioning the propriety of ordering confiscation of abandoned goods. The court found in favor of the importer, setting aside the impugned orders and remanding the matter for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to consider the importer's submissions and address the procedural aspects thoroughly. en-us Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345038 The judgment in this case involved various issues such as failure to confiscate goods provisionally released on bond, mis-declaration to evade floor price, challenge against penalty imposition based on expired notifications, and questioning the propriety of ordering confiscation of abandoned goods. The court found in favor of the importer, setting aside the impugned orders and remanding the matter for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to consider the importer's submissions and address the procedural aspects thoroughly. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345038