<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 149 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345037</link>
    <description>The judgment set aside the impugned order and directed the original authority to reevaluate the evidence, consider pending assessments, and afford the appellants an opportunity to present their contentions. The complexity of the case required a thorough review of the legal and procedural aspects, ensuring a fair and comprehensive adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 08:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 149 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345037</link>
      <description>The judgment set aside the impugned order and directed the original authority to reevaluate the evidence, consider pending assessments, and afford the appellants an opportunity to present their contentions. The complexity of the case required a thorough review of the legal and procedural aspects, ensuring a fair and comprehensive adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>