https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192968 The judge found the addition of rent on a property unjustified as the appellant provided sufficient evidence of transferring ownership to her daughter. The judge emphasized that the daughter's ownership was not disputed in previous years, ruling that the rental income should be assessed in her name. Consequently, the judge set aside the lower authorities' orders and deleted the addition of Rs. 1,16,640 in the appellant's hands, allowing the appeal. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jul 2017 08:23:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192968 The judge found the addition of rent on a property unjustified as the appellant provided sufficient evidence of transferring ownership to her daughter. The judge emphasized that the daughter's ownership was not disputed in previous years, ruling that the rental income should be assessed in her name. Consequently, the judge set aside the lower authorities' orders and deleted the addition of Rs. 1,16,640 in the appellant's hands, allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192968