<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1229 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192971</link>
    <description>Conditions governing the investigation were sought to be modified so the petitioners could be interrogated and the restraint on further investigative steps removed. The Court found the request to filing of the challan premature because the investigation remained incomplete, and held that no adverse presumption could yet be drawn that the petitioners would not cooperate. Relying on the assurance that arrest was not proposed at that stage, the Court directed the petitioners to join the investigation and recorded that they would not be arrested when they appeared for that purpose. Relief was granted only to that limited extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 08:23:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1229 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192971</link>
      <description>Conditions governing the investigation were sought to be modified so the petitioners could be interrogated and the restraint on further investigative steps removed. The Court found the request to filing of the challan premature because the investigation remained incomplete, and held that no adverse presumption could yet be drawn that the petitioners would not cooperate. Relying on the assurance that arrest was not proposed at that stage, the Court directed the petitioners to join the investigation and recorded that they would not be arrested when they appeared for that purpose. Relief was granted only to that limited extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>