https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192973 Questions of law in the appeal were held to be covered by an earlier binding judgment of the same High Court. Applying that precedent, the Court answered the questions consistently with the prior decision and rejected the Revenue's challenge to the CESTAT order. The legal principle applied is that where the issues raised are already governed by a binding earlier judgment of the same Court, the questions of law must be answered in line with that precedent. The questions were accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. en-us Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192973 Questions of law in the appeal were held to be covered by an earlier binding judgment of the same High Court. Applying that precedent, the Court answered the questions consistently with the prior decision and rejected the Revenue's challenge to the CESTAT order. The legal principle applied is that where the issues raised are already governed by a binding earlier judgment of the same Court, the questions of law must be answered in line with that precedent. The questions were accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192973